Characters deride Cha Seok-jin as a 'leashed loyal dog' in 'A Trap Called Desire'
KBS drama 'A Trap Called Desire' highlights the intense conflict as characters mock Cha Seok-jin's social standing and business struggles.
The cynical perspectives of those around Cha Seok-jin, a character in the KBS drama 'A Trap Called Desire,' have been revealed. In a video released on September 18, 2026, the drama's tension intensifies as Cha's social standing and the harsh evaluations from his peers intersect.

Reactions to HERA's consideration and son-in-law treatment
In the video, Cha is depicted as maintaining his business and showing outward growth. However, characters conversing with him mention how HERA seems to have taken special care of him, noting the CEO's consideration. During this exchange, dialogue suggests that while Cha's finances appear to be improving, the treatment he receives as a son-in-law is almost shameless. The video also notes that HERA has liked only Cha since her high school years.
Cha Seok-jin's business crisis behind the facade
Specific details regarding Cha's business situation also emerge. According to the dialogue, Cha's loan extension was rejected by his primary bank and his contract with a major distributor has been blocked, revealing significant business struggles that contradict his successful outward appearance.
Cha Seok-jin's position derided as a 'leashed loyal dog'
Perceptions of Cha's success remain overwhelmingly negative. Characters in the video mention his relationship with HERA and disparage him, claiming he is "nothing more than Cheong-ma's leashed loyal dog." One character asserts that Cha is merely a nominal proxy son-in-law who is forced to handle all of Cheong-ma's unpleasant business. Furthermore, they suggest that the performance of his recently launched brand is nothing more than a mere excuse.
These conversations demonstrate the perception that Cha's social status and business achievements stem from specific connections rather than his own abilities. The video illustrates the underlying conflict by juxtaposing rumors of his business failures with blatant disparaging remarks directed at him.
