The Trap of "Who Contacted Whom First"... A Couple Stuck Between Past 'Infidelity' and 'Stalking'

The image of a couple experiencing conflict due to diverging memories regarding past mistakes has been revealed. In a video from JTBC's 'Divorce Camp', it was disclosed that the wife met her current husband during a period when she was living with her former boyfriend, and the legal conflicts that arose during that process were revealed.

"I was the affair partner"... The starting point of a meeting that began during cohabitation

In the video, the wife revealed that at the time their relationship began, she was in a relationship with her current husband while not having completely ended things with her existing boyfriend. The wife directly mentioned that she was "effectively the affair partner" in her relationship with her husband, stating, "The place I was staying with the boyfriend I was originally seeing was a cohabitation, and I started the relationship without things being settled."

Regarding the situation at the time, the wife explained, "I requested one month of time to settle things with the man, and I tried to keep that promise, but things were not settled." The husband pointed out that he continued the relationship while the wife was living with another man. In response, the cast members pointed out the problem of the situation at the time, saying, "You should have settled with one person, or if you couldn't settle, you shouldn't have met them."

In particular, the wife added that she promised to take one month to break up with her former boyfriend, but because the situation was not settled, the period stretched to one month, two months, and three months. The husband revealed the depth of the conflict by mentioning that the wife lived with another man and met him in the evenings.

'Stalking' and 'Detention Center'... Diverging memories and legal battles

The relationship between the two has previously escalated into legal issues due to the husband's actions. It was reported that the husband was reported to the police for issues such as trespassing while protesting the wife's past actions, and even experienced being held in a detention center. The wife defined the husband's behavior as 'stalking' during this process, but the husband showed that he did not accept this.

Regarding the situation at the time, the wife explained that the husband engaged in actions such as calling unilaterally, and when the former boyfriend reported them to the police after the husband suddenly entered, it happened. The husband claimed that he met her again after apologizing to her upon being released from the detention center, but the wife countered regarding the catalyst for their reunion, claiming that she was the one who went to him after seeing a letter he wrote.

This detailed dispute over "who contacted whom first and went to see whom" was becoming a major cause of the couple's fights. Regarding the reason why the wife is sensitive to small factual details of the past, the cast members pointed out that "they have fought countless times over this one year of past events," noting that violence occurred as situations of being advantageous or disadvantageous due to small facts were repeated.

"A detailed fight to hide a major mistake"

The cast members analyzed the reason why the couple repeatedly obsesses over peripheral factual details such as "who did it first." According to the conversation in the video, the couple showed a tendency to avoid conflict by shifting the topic to trivial factual details rather than facing the clear mistakes of the past.

One cast member pointed out that they are "fighting with trivial details to hide a major mistake," noting that rather than admitting their past mistakes, the two are blurring the point by blaming each other's actions. The husband even mentioned past events, saying, "I had to pay a fine because of you," while pointing out the wife's mistakes.

Nevertheless, the two admitted that affection for each other remains. The husband said he intentionally plays pranks on the wife, saying, "There is this much affection," and the cast members' analysis followed that neither of them would act this way if there were no affection.